Start from the meeting record
The AI meeting notes page covers capture, speakers, transcript, summary, and live insight. This workflow begins after that record exists and asks which statements actually require follow-through.
Ghost separates decisions, commitments, open questions, and background context, then carries the actionable work into Focus without cutting it loose from the meeting that created it.
In an Atlas launch review, Maya agrees to send the readiness brief on Friday. Ghost keeps the exact meeting record available, proposes “Send Maya the readiness brief” with the stated timing, and places it in the Atlas launch Epic for review.
This is one workflow across Ghost, not a bundle of disconnected products. Each feature owns a specific stage and keeps its own access boundary.
The AI meeting notes page covers capture, speakers, transcript, summary, and live insight. This workflow begins after that record exists and asks which statements actually require follow-through.
A confirmed action becomes a source-linked item in the AI to-do list, where priority, status, and the surrounding brief stay visible across To Do, In Progress, and Done.
When the decision needs more explanation than a task description can carry, Ghost can keep an editable working note beside the task and link both records back to the meeting.
The handoff stays inspectable from source to result. Every stage names what it received, what changed, and what needs review.
Ghost works from the transcript, summary, speaker identity, and meeting metadata instead of treating a short recap as the entire source. The meeting remains the place to verify what was actually said.
A decision describes what changed. An action item names work to do. An open question still needs an answer. Background context explains why. Ghost keeps those categories distinct instead of turning every sentence into a task.
If the speaker named an owner, deadline, or priority, those details can travel with the task. When a field is missing or ambiguous, the workflow surfaces the gap for review rather than inventing a commitment.
The approved action moves into Focus with a concise title, useful brief, and reference to the meeting. The ready-to-start prompt can then reopen the context when Ghost or the user resumes the work.
Several actions from the same outcome can live in one Epic. Epic progress comes from its child to-dos, so the launch outcome and each next step remain visible without duplicating status.
The item progresses from To Do to In Progress to Done on the Kanban board. Its source does not disappear when its status changes, which makes later review and correction possible.
Connected work still needs accurate sources, explicit destinations, and review where an action changes another person’s system.
Yes. Ghost can distinguish actionable commitments from decisions and context, then propose source-linked Focus items for review. The quality of the result still depends on the meeting record and whether the owner or timing was actually stated.
Ghost can keep the action and mark the missing detail instead of guessing. The user can assign an owner, add timing, or leave the item unassigned while preserving the source meeting.
The workflow is designed to retain the meeting as source context. A Focus item can point back to the meeting record and, when useful, to an editable working note that explains the decision.
Yes. Ghost Focus organizes to-dos across To Do, In Progress, and Done. Related items can sit inside an Epic whose progress reflects the state of its child tasks.
No. A Focus item tracks work and context. A scheduled AI task is a separate run configured for a future time or recurrence.
Bring the source, the intended result, and the boundaries that matter. Ghost is in private beta for macOS.
Request access