Ground the recap in what was said
The completed meeting transcript and summary supply the decisions, questions, and speaker context. Follow-up starts with that source rather than a generic template.
Ghost can use the completed meeting record to assemble the recap, proposed action items, a follow-up draft, and the next check-in—while keeping creation, sending, and monitoring as separate operations.
After a customer onboarding review, Ghost prepares the decision recap, places two confirmed actions in Focus, drafts the attendee email from the meeting record, and keeps the unresolved migration date available for the next configured check.
This is one workflow across Ghost, not a bundle of disconnected products. Each feature owns a specific stage and keeps its own access boundary.
The completed meeting transcript and summary supply the decisions, questions, and speaker context. Follow-up starts with that source rather than a generic template.
Supported Gmail and Calendar integrations can provide the intended thread, recipients, event, and surrounding context. Reading, drafting, sending, and changing an event remain different operations.
A configured proactive AI check can surface an unresolved commitment before the next relevant moment. It is not blanket inbox monitoring or an invented notification guarantee.
The handoff stays inspectable from source to result. Every stage names what it received, what changed, and what needs review.
Ghost uses the final transcript, speaker attribution, and meeting identity so the follow-up is tied to the correct conversation and attendees.
The recap leads with what changed, what remains open, and which next steps were actually agreed. Background discussion stays available in the source instead of crowding the follow-up.
Confirmed commitments can move through meeting notes to tasks, retaining the stated owner, timing, and meeting link on each Focus item.
Ghost can prepare a Gmail draft that reflects the meeting and the user’s opted-in writing style. The recipients and claims should be reviewed before any separate send action.
For a recurring meeting, Ghost can use the intended Calendar event to understand when the subject returns. Changing an event is separate and may notify other people.
Heartbeat or an explicitly scheduled run can revisit an open item later. The follow-up page does not assume that every Focus date creates a notification.
Connected work still needs accurate sources, explicit destinations, and review where an action changes another person’s system.
No. Ghost can prepare a grounded Gmail draft, but drafting and sending are separate actions. The intended recipients and content should be reviewed before a send is requested.
Yes. Confirmed commitments can become source-linked Focus items with the stated owner and timing. Missing details remain visible rather than being silently invented.
A configured Heartbeat or scheduled run can bring unresolved work back before a relevant meeting. The exact behavior depends on the requested cadence, available Calendar context, and configured delivery path.
Only when the relevant integration and operation are supported, requested, and authorized. Creating a Ghost Focus item does not itself update an external project or customer system.
A specific supported thread check can be requested or scheduled. Connecting Gmail does not mean Ghost continuously watches every conversation by default.
Bring the source, the intended result, and the boundaries that matter. Ghost is in private beta for macOS.
Request access