Start with the transcript and decision
AI meeting notes provide the speaker, transcript, decision, and surrounding context needed to distinguish a real issue from brainstorming.
Ghost can identify candidate work in a meeting record, check whether it already exists, propose the right Jira shape, and hold the issue for review before creating or updating external work.
In an Atlas launch review, the team confirms an authentication regression and its acceptance criteria. Ghost finds the existing launch Epic, proposes a Bug linked to the meeting record, and waits for review before creating or updating Jira.
This is one workflow across Ghost, not a bundle of disconnected products. Each feature owns a specific stage and keeps its own access boundary.
AI meeting notes provide the speaker, transcript, decision, and surrounding context needed to distinguish a real issue from brainstorming.
The Jira integration can search, create, or update supported work items when that specific operation is requested and authorized.
A Ghost Focus item can track the user’s own next step even when the team’s durable engineering record belongs in Jira. The two objects should not be silently conflated.
The handoff stays inspectable from source to result. Every stage names what it received, what changed, and what needs review.
Ghost reads the completed meeting record and identifies decisions, defects, requests, and action items that could belong in Jira.
The workflow searches the relevant project, Epic, or backlog for matching active work. Updating the right issue is often better than creating a duplicate.
Ghost suggests Bug, Story, Task, or another supported type along with a concise summary, description, project, Epic, assignee, priority, and stated timing.
Criteria spoken in the meeting can be included. Missing owners, dates, reproduction steps, or project details are surfaced for review rather than filled with plausible guesses.
The user confirms whether to create a new issue or update an existing one. Creating or changing Jira work can affect teammates, automation, and reporting.
The resulting issue can retain the meeting or note as source context, while meeting memory helps bring the decision and current Jira status into a later conversation.
Connected work still needs accurate sources, explicit destinations, and review where an action changes another person’s system.
Ghost can propose a Jira issue from a completed meeting record and perform a supported create operation after the project, fields, source, and user intent are reviewed.
The workflow can search relevant active Jira work before proposing a new issue. When an existing issue represents the same work, updating it may be the more accurate action.
Ghost can propose an appropriate supported issue type from the meeting context, but the user should review project-specific conventions and required fields before creation.
The workflow can keep a source reference to the meeting or supporting note so a later reviewer can understand where the requirement and acceptance criteria came from.
No. A personal Focus item and a Jira work item are separate records. An external Jira create or update requires its own requested action.
Bring the source, the intended result, and the boundaries that matter. Ghost is in private beta for macOS.
Request access