Gather evidence before writing slides
The AI research assistant investigates the decision, reads relevant sources, and separates supported findings from gaps or conflicting evidence.
Ghost can investigate a question, retain the sources and caveats in a working brief, shape the story for a specific audience, and build a deck whose claims can still be checked.
For an Atlas market-entry review, Ghost gathers current competitor and customer evidence, records the strongest findings and open gaps, proposes a decision-led outline, then creates a compact presentation with source references ready for review.
This is one workflow across Ghost, not a bundle of disconnected products. Each feature owns a specific stage and keeps its own access boundary.
The AI research assistant investigates the decision, reads relevant sources, and separates supported findings from gaps or conflicting evidence.
The findings can live in an editable research note with URLs, quotations kept within context, caveats, and visual opportunities available to the next stage.
The AI presentation maker turns the reviewed brief into HTML or PowerPoint output with a clear narrative order rather than copying every research paragraph onto a slide.
The handoff stays inspectable from source to result. Every stage names what it received, what changed, and what needs review.
The workflow starts with what the presentation needs to help someone decide, who will see it, and what level of evidence or technical detail that audience needs.
Ghost gathers current sources, follows useful references, records URLs, and notes disagreements or missing evidence. Search results are inputs to inspect, not facts to repeat without review.
Key findings, supporting evidence, caveats, and unanswered questions are organized before slide design starts. This brief becomes the durable handoff between research and presentation work.
Ghost orders the material around the decision: context, evidence, implications, options, and next steps. Each slide should have a job and one clear message.
The presentation workflow builds the supported output, then checks hierarchy, density, charts, source labels, speaker notes, and export behavior. The deck remains editable rather than becoming an unexplained image.
Claims are checked against the source brief, citations are still reachable, and the final file or preview is reviewed. A public publishing step is separate and happens only when requested.
Connected work still needs accurate sources, explicit destinations, and review where an action changes another person’s system.
Ghost can move a reviewed research brief into supported presentation output, including PowerPoint or HTML workflows. The final format, content, and export still need review for the intended audience.
The workflow keeps source URLs and claim context in the research brief and can carry appropriate references into the deck. The user should verify that every important claim still points to the right source before sharing.
Yes. Research, note-making, outlining, and presentation creation can be stages of one requested job. Keeping distinct stages makes it easier to inspect evidence before design choices hide gaps.
No. Building or previewing a presentation does not authorize public exposure. Publishing or external sharing is a separate requested action.
The workflow begins with evidence and preserves a research brief, caveats, and source trail. Slide generation is the last transformation, not a substitute for researching and checking the claims.
Bring the source, the intended result, and the boundaries that matter. Ghost is in private beta for macOS.
Request access