Ghost can move from a concrete question to a structured brief, collect and compare the relevant sources, create a reviewable report, and carry the conclusions into the next real action.
For an Atlas launch-readiness report, Ghost retrieves the approved project sources, summarizes current status, separates completed checks from open risks, cites the evidence behind each finding, creates the supported report file, and proposes the unresolved items as Focus tasks.
This is one workflow across Ghost, not a bundle of disconnected products. Each feature owns a specific stage and keeps its own access boundary.
The AI research assistant gathers current sources, compares claims, records uncertainty, and keeps URLs close to the evidence. The report begins with a research question and source scope, not an invented conclusion.
The AI note taker can hold the outline, evidence, decisions, and revisions while the report develops. Source-linked notes make it possible to inspect what changed between a raw finding and the final narrative.
A reviewed report can become an AI-generated presentation with a different level of detail, while the original sources and caveats remain available for verification before sharing.
The handoff stays inspectable from source to result. Every stage names what it received, what changed, and what needs review.
The brief identifies the audience, central question, scope, time period, output format, required sections, and sources that must or must not be used. A report without a decision or reader becomes a generic summary.
Ghost can combine public research, selected browser pages, meeting notes, local or connected documents, and structured data that are available to the task. Every important finding keeps a route back to its evidence.
The report structure follows the question: executive summary, context, method, findings, implications, limitations, recommendations, and next steps where those sections are useful. The outline changes when the evidence demands it.
Reported facts, source claims, calculations, assumptions, and Ghost’s interpretation are kept distinct. Tables, charts, or computations can be prepared in a managed sandbox when the supplied data supports them.
The user can inspect source links, unsupported statements, conflicting evidence, missing data, and audience fit before Ghost creates the supported document or saves the report as a working note.
A finding can become a source-linked Focus task, the report can move into a presentation, a managed result can be published when requested, or the same brief can run later through Scheduled tasks with explicit comparison rules.
Connected work still needs accurate sources, explicit destinations, and review where an action changes another person’s system.
Ghost can create structured research, project, analysis, meeting, and business reports when the user supplies a clear question, source scope, audience, and output requirement.
Yes. The workflow is designed to retain source URLs and document identities beside the relevant evidence so important claims can be checked before the report is shared.
Ghost can use supported document and sandbox tools to create requested report artifacts, including a document workflow where available. The exact format and delivery path should be defined and verified for the task.
Yes. After the report is reviewed, Ghost can adapt the argument for a presentation while keeping the detailed report, evidence, and caveats available behind the slides.
A recurring report can be configured as a scheduled AI task with explicit sources, comparison rules, output behavior, and failure reporting. Creating one report does not automatically schedule the next one.
Bring the source, the intended result, and the boundaries that matter. Ghost is in private beta for macOS.
Request access